HOMEPARA ESPANOLPRACTICE AREASATTORNEY PROFILENewsCONTACT USCLIENT'S BILL OF RIGHTSSUCCESSESPUBLICATIONSDON'T WAITFAQ'SRESOURCESDISCLAIMER
"Quality Service With My Personal Attention"
NEWSLETTER
Personal Injury September 7, 2010
 
Personal Injury
 

Cashing Out a Structured Settlement

Many people enter into a "structured settlement" as a result of recovery on a legal claim, such as personal injury, ...(more)

 

Toys That Pose a Hazard to Young Children

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) regulates the distribution of 15,000 types of consumer products that pose an unreasonable ...(more)

 

Attractive Nuisances and Children

Attractive nuisances are places or structures on a property that invite the curiosity of children. If a child is injured ...(more)

 

Strict Liability for Dangerous Animals and Ultrahazardous Activities

Typically, owners of dangerous animals and others engaged in ultrahazardous activities owe an absolute duty to make the animal or ...(more)

 

Personal Injury Headlines

Payouts to Injured Nuclear Weapons Workers Reach $6 Billion

Workplace deaths fall to lowest level since 1992

Motor Vehicle Crash Injuries Costing $99 Billion a Year, or $500 per Driver

Five car crash victims remain hospitalized

Dog Bite Claims Top $400M in 2009; Rise 30% in Last 6 Years

Employers' Liability for Failing to Screen Potential Employees


"Negligent hiring" is a legal doctrine that holds employers liable for unlawful acts committed by their employees. The issue arises when an employer hires a person that she knew or should have known could pose an undue risk of harm to others within the course and scope of employment.

Under this doctrine, the employer has the responsibility for checking the background and references of any job applicant before placing that individual in a situation of contact with the public. Examples of businesses particularly at risk may include:

  • Schools
  • Housing
  • Youth organizations
  • Customer-service

Establishing a Claim Under Negligent Hiring
A person that alleges injuries caused by an employee and expects to hold the employer liable under the doctrine of negligent hiring must show that:

  1. The employer owed a duty to that person because there was an association or connection between that person and the services or business the employer provides;
  2. The nature and frequency of the employee's contact with the public may pose a potential risk of harm; and
  3. Evidence of the employee's potential risk to others existed prior to and at the time of the hiring and that the employer failed to investigate.

Negligent Hiring Frequently Cited in Litigation
In December, 2005, the parents of an eight year-old boy filed a lawsuit against FedEx Corp., alleging the negligent hiring of Paul Sykes, a convicted sex offender. The lawsuit alleged that Sykes approached the family at the Connecticut FedEx Kinko's store where he was employed, and offered to repair their home computer. While visiting their home to repair the computer, Sykes allegedly assaulted their son. The lawsuit asserted that FedEx knew, or should have known, of Sykes' dangerous propensities as a sexual predator. In April of 2007 Sykes was sentenced to 12 years in prison for the molestation.  In 2008, a federal judge dismissed the civil lawsuit against FedEx, ruling the company could not be held responsible for the conduct of its employee outside the workplace. The case is currently on appeal. 

© 2010 NextClient.com, Inc.  All rights reserved.